To tap into the potential of these new market opportunities, operators need to see real economic returns.
Electric energy is cheaper than kerosene, and electric powered trains additionally come with significantly reduced maintenance costs in comparison to gas turbines. The resulting overall reduced operating costs make utilising routes that previously seemed unattractive financially viable again, for the transport of both passengers and goods.
Electric propulsion can generate additional value for operators. Its low noise offers the possibility of expanded slot times at airports – for more deliveries early in the day or late at night, or for even more flexible short-distance travel.
There are also wider financial arguments for the development of electric-powered commuter aircraft: they are a more efficient use of national infrastructure. Already about 99% of the US population lives within 30km of an electric RAM-feasible airfield, in Europe it is 77%. In Germany, about 80% of the population lives within a radius of just 20km of an airfield or airport.
With greater investment in electric commuter aircraft, these airports can be used more fully and in doing so save on alternative mass transit infrastructure costs.