18 Post-retirement benefits

The Group operates a number of defined benefit and defined contribution schemes.

For the UK defined benefit schemes, the assets are held in separate trustee administered funds and employees are entitled to retirement benefits based on their final salaries and length of service.

Overseas defined benefit schemes are a mixture of funded and unfunded plans. Additionally in the US, and to a lesser extent in some other countries, the Group's employment practices include the provision of healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees. These schemes are unfunded.

The valuations of the defined benefit schemes are based on the most recent funding valuations, updated by the scheme actuaries to December 31, 2007. The most recent funding valuations of the main UK schemes were:

Scheme  
Valuation date
Rolls-Royce Pension Fund   March 31, 2006
Rolls-Royce Group Pension Scheme   April 5, 20071
Vickers Group Pension Scheme   March 31, 20071
1 Preliminary

As described in the Finance Director's review, during 2007, the trustees of the UK defined benefit schemes, in consultation with the Group, have undertaken a review of their investment strategies. As a result, revised investment strategies have been adopted that aim to hedge, on an economic basis, the majority of the interest rate and inflation risks associated with pension liabilities by investing a significant proportion of each schemes' assets in swap contracts, backed by short-term money market deposits (the liability-driven investment or LDI portfolio). Following the agreement of this revised strategy, new entrants are no longer able to join the schemes and the Group has paid additional contributions of £500m to the main UK pensions schemes.

As described in note 1, for accounting purposes, the defined benefit schemes are valued in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits. In particular, IAS 19 requires the discount rate used for the valuation of forecast liabilities to be determined by reference to the market yield on high quality corporate bonds. In contrast, for funding purposes, the discount rate is determined by reference to the expected rate of return on the scheme's assets, taking account of the specific investment strategy in place. As a result of this difference in valuation methodologies, the amounts recognised in the balance sheet will differ from those that would have been recognised if the valuation had been undertaken using the assumptions used for funding purposes.

Accordingly, although the investment strategy aims to hedge interest rate and inflation risk on an economic basis, the net position recognised in the balance sheet for UK defined benefit schemes may vary over time as a result of actuarial gains and losses that arise due to this difference in valuation methodologies.

Amounts recognised in the income statement
  2007 2006
  UK
schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
UK
schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
Defined benefit schemes:            
Current service cost 100 25 125 102 28 130
Past service cost 131 2 133 2 2
  231 27 258 102 30 132
Defined contribution schemes 3 17 20 2 14 16
Operating cost 234 44 278 104 44 148
Financing (income)/costs in respect of defined benefit schemes:            
Expected return on assets (367) (17) (384) (328) (15) (343)
Interest on liabilities 323 31 354 310 30 340
  (44) 14 (30) (18) 15 (3)
Total income statement charge 190 58 248 86 59 145
The operating cost is charged as follows:
  Defined benefit Defined contribution Total
  2007
£m
2006
£m
2007
£m
2006
£m
2007
£m
2006
£m
Cost of sales 223 93 15 11 238 104
Commercial and administrative costs 26 30 4 4 30 34
Research and development 9 9 1 1 10 10
  258 132 20 16 278 148
Amounts recognised in the statement of recognised income and expense
  2007
£m
2006
£m
Actuarial gain on scheme assets 161 132
Experience gains on scheme liabilities 350 470
Movement in unrecognised surplus (112)
  399 602

In December 2007, PaySave was introduced in the UK. This a salary sacrifice scheme under which employees elect to stop making employee contributions and the Group makes additional contributions in return for a reduction in gross contractual pay. As a result, there has been a decrease in wages and salaries and a corresponding increase in pension costs of £3m in the year.

Defined benefit schemes
Assumptions
The principal actuarial assumptions used at the balance sheet date were as follows:
  2007 2006
  UK
schemes
%
Overseas
schemes
%
UK
schemes
%
Overseas
schemes
%
Rate of increase in salaries 5.0 3.8 4.4 3.6
Rate of increase of pensions in payment1 3.5 0.4 2.9 0.3
Discount rate 5.8 6.0 5.1 5.6
Expected rate of return on scheme assets 5.4 7.5 6.6 7.0
Inflation assumption 3.5 2.5 2.9 2.4
1Benefits accruing after April 5, 2005 are assumed to increase in payment at a rate of 2.4 per cent.

The discount rates are determined by reference to the market yields on AA rated corporate bonds. For the main UK schemes, the rate is determined by using the profile of forecast benefit payments to derive a weighted average discount rate from the yield curve. For less significant UK schemes and overseas schemes, the rate is determined as the market yield at the average duration of the forecast benefit payments. The discount rates above are the weighted average of those for each scheme, based on the value of their respective liabilities.

The overall expected rate of return is calculated by weighting the individual returns expected from each asset class (see below) in accordance with the actual asset balance in the schemes' investment portfolios.

The mortality assumptions adopted for the UK pension schemes are derived from the PA92 actuarial tables, with medium cohort, published by the Institute of Actuaries, projected forward and, where appropriate, adjusted to take account of the relevant scheme's actual experience. The resulting range of life expectancies in the principal UK schemes are as follows:

Life expectancy from age 65
Current pensioner 17.5 years to 22.2 years
Future pensioner 19.5 years to 23.9 years

Other demographic assumptions have been set on advice from the relevant actuary, having regard to the latest trends in scheme experience and other relevant data. The assumptions are reviewed and updated as necessary as part of the periodic actuarial valuation of the schemes.

Assumptions in respect of overseas schemes are also set in accordance with advice from local actuaries.

The future costs of healthcare benefits are based on an assumed healthcare costs trend rate of nine per cent grading down to five per cent over seven years.

Amounts recognised in the balance sheet
  2007 2006
  UK
schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
  UK
schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
Present value of funded obligations (6,335) (293) (6,628)   (6,338) (271) (6,609)
Fair value of scheme assets 6,626 277 6,903   5,673 233 5,906
  291 (16) 275   (665) (38) (703)
Present value of unfunded obligations (284) (284)   (290) (290)
Unrecognised surplus 2 (110) (4) (114)   (2) (2)
Net asset/(liability) recognised in the balance sheet 181 (304) (123)   (665) (330) (995)
               
Analysed as: 3              
Post-retirement scheme surpluses 210 210   22 22
Post-retirement scheme deficits (29) (304) (333)   (687) (330) (1,017)
  181 (304) (123)   (665) (330) (995)
2Where a surplus has arisen on a scheme, in accordance with IAS 19, the surplus is recognised as an asset only if it represents an unconditional economic benefit available to the Group in the future. Any surplus in excess of this benefit is not recognised in the balance sheet. Surpluses have arisen on the UK schemes in 2007, largely as a result of differences between the actuarial and IAS 19 valuation assumptions.

3Comparatives have been restated to show the split between post-retirement scheme surpluses and deficits.
Changes in present value of defined benefit obligations
  2007   2006
  UK
schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
  UK
schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
At January 1 (6,338) (561) (6,899)   (6,661) (559) (7,220)
Exchange adjustments (15) (15)   65 65
Current service cost (100) (25) (125)   (102) (28) (130)
Past service cost (131) (2) (133)   (2) (2)
Finance cost (323) (31) (354)   (310) (30) (340)
Contributions by employees (38) (2) (40)   (39) (2) (41)
Net benefits paid out 286 18 304   279 18 297
Actuarial gains/(losses) 309 41 350   495 (25) 470
Settlements/curtailment   2 2
At December 31 (6,335) (577) (6,912)   (6,338) (561) (6,899)
Funded schemes (6,335) (293) (6,628)   (6,338) (271) (6,609)
Unfunded schemes (284) (284)   (290) (290)
Changes in fair value of scheme assets
  2007   2006
  UK schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
  UK schemes
£m
Overseas
schemes
£m
Total
£m
At January 1 5,673 233 5,906   5,343 220 5,563
Exchange adjustments 9 9   (27) (27)
Expected return on assets 367 17 384   328 15 343
Contributions by employer 677 30 707   122 31 153
Contributions by employees 38 2 40   39 2 41
Benefits paid out (286) (18) (304)   (279) (18) (297)
Actuarial gains 157 4 161   120 12 132
Settlements/curtailment   (2) (2)
At December 31 6,626 277 6,903   5,673 233 5,906
Actual return on scheme assets     545       475
The fair value of the scheme assets in the principal schemes and the expected rates of return at December 31, were as follows:
  2007   2006
  Expected
rate of return
%
Market
value
£m
  Expected
rate of return
%
Market
value
£m
UK schemes:          
LDI portfolio 4.7 4,595  
Equities 7.8 1,651   7.5 3,876
Sovereign debt 4.6 48   4.5 629
Corporate bonds 5.1 88   4.9 1,164
Other 4.9 244   5.0 4
  5.4 6,626   6.6 5,673
Overseas schemes:          
Equities 9.0 165   8.3 146
Corporate bonds 4.8 86   4.9 71
Other 6.4 26   5.1 16
  7.5 277   7.0 233

The scheme assets do not include any of the Group's own financial instruments, nor any property occupied by, or other assets used by, the Group.

The expected rate of return for LDI portfolios is determined by the implicit yield on the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The expected rates of return on other individual categories of scheme assets are determined by reference to gilt yields. In the UK, equities and corporate bonds are assumed to generate returns that exceed the return from gilts by 3.25 per cent and 0.8 per cent per annum respectively.

The expected rates of return above are the weighted average of the rates for each scheme.

Future contributions

The Group expects to contribute approximately £271m to its defined benefit schemes in 2008.

Sensitivities

As described above, the revised investment strategies are designed to hedge the risks from interest rates and inflation. The principle remaining risks relate to the assumptions for mortality and increases in salaries. If the age ratings in respect of the principal UK defined benefit schemes were increased by one year, the scheme liabilities would increase by £164m. If the rate of increase in salaries were 0.5 per cent higher, scheme liabilities would increase by £112m.

The defined benefit obligation relating to post-retirement medical benefits would increase by £33m if the healthcare trend rate increases by one per cent, and reduce by £27m if it decreases by one per cent. The pension expense relating to post-retirement medical benefits, comprising service cost and interest cost, would increase by £4m if the healthcare trend increases by one per cent, and reduce by £3m if it decreases by one per cent.

History of defined benefit schemes

The history of the schemes for the current and prior years is as follows:
  2007
£m
2006
£m
2005
£m
2004
£m
Balance sheet        
Present value of defined benefit obligations (6,912) (6,899) (7,220) (6,107)
Fair value of scheme assets 6,903 5,906 5,563 4,698
Unrecognised surplus (114) (2) (2)
Deficit (123) (995) (1,659) (1,409)
         
Experience gains/losses        
Actuarial gains on scheme assets 161 132 588 126
Experience gains/(losses) on scheme liabilities 350 470 (868) (133)
Movement in unrecognised surplus (112) (2)
Total amount recognised in the statement of recognised income and expense 399 602 (282) (7)
Cumulative since January 1, 2004 712 313 (289) (7)

In accordance with the transitional provision amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits in December 2004, the disclosures above are determined prospectively from 2004.

Back to top